<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tom Graves / Tetradian &#187; thingamy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weblog.tetradian.com/tag/thingamy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weblog.tetradian.com</link>
	<description>Random ramblings over the metaphoric edge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 16:57:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Executable enterprise architecture</title>
		<link>http://weblog.tetradian.com/2009/07/01/executable-ea/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=executable-ea</link>
		<comments>http://weblog.tetradian.com/2009/07/01/executable-ea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 12:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom G</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Complexity / Structure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[process development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thingamy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.tomgraves.org/index.php/2009/07/01/executable-ea/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just come off the phone from an excellent conversation with Sigurd Rinde, developer of Thingamy &#8211; brilliantly summarised by Hugh &#8216;gapingvoid&#8217; MacLeod on 30megs.com (&#8220;Here&#8217;s 30 megs. Now go run Germany.&#8221;) Key point is that it connects exactly with whole-of-enterprise architecture: the architecture analysis phase &#8211; the &#8216;enterprise ontology&#8217; &#8211; leads directly to enterprise software [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just come off the phone from an excellent conversation with <a href="http://twitter.com/sig" title="Sigurd Rinde on Twitter">Sigurd Rinde</a>, developer of <a href="http://thingamy.com" title="Thingamy">Thingamy</a> &#8211; brilliantly summarised by <a href="http://twitter.com/gapingvoid" title="Hugh McLeod on Twitter">Hugh &#8216;gapingvoid&#8217; MacLeod</a> on <a href="http://30megs.com" title="30megs.com - summary of Thingamy">30megs.com</a> (&#8220;Here&#8217;s 30 megs. Now go run Germany.&#8221;)</p>
<p>Key point is that it connects exactly with whole-of-enterprise architecture: the architecture analysis phase &#8211; the &#8216;enterprise ontology&#8217; &#8211; leads <em>directly</em> to enterprise software for information/process flow. So it&#8217;s not just &#8216;actionable enterprise architecture&#8217; &#8211; to use a current popular buzz-term &#8211; but <em>executable</em> enterprise architecture. A few of the existing enterprise architecture toolsets are starting to get somewhere close to this &#8211; <a href="http://www.pro-mis.com" title="EVA NetModeler by Promis">EVA NetModeler</a> from Promis being perhaps the best example &#8211; but this comes at it from another direction entirely, and a more immediately usable direction at that.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s just the start. The key aim of Thingamy is to tackle the complex, near-chaotic, barely-repeatable process-flows that businesses really use in most of their work, and which to date have barely been addressed by existing enterprise software, precisely because they <em>don&#8217;t</em> fit the usual clunky true/false logic. The real-world processes that <em>people</em> use, in fact. Sigurd suggests that something like two-thirds of all business processes fit into this &#8216;barely repeatable&#8217; category, yet almost all &#8216;enterprise software&#8217; efforts to date have focussed on the &#8216;easily repeatable&#8217; end of the scale, precisely because it <em>is</em> &#8216;easier&#8217; (easier to sell to those who cling onto wistful dreams of &#8216;control&#8217;, too&#8230; :wrygrin: ). As with the comparison of analogue and digital &#8211; analogue can replicate digital, but digital can never do more than provide a abstraction of analogue &#8211; so too are the &#8216;easily repeatable&#8217; processes merely a limited subset of the real &#8216;barely repeatable&#8217; ones. So something that&#8217;s designed to tackle the &#8216;barely repeatable&#8217; processes can <em>also</em> do all the &#8216;easily repeatable&#8217; ones &#8211; yet much, much more. <em>Definitely</em> interesting&#8230;</p>
<p>To an enterprise architect, one obvious example of a &#8216;barely repeatable process&#8217; is enterprise architecture itself. With many thanks to Sigurd, I&#8217;ve downloaded a copy of Thingamy, and over the next few weeks &#8211; time and sanity permitting &#8211; will have a go at implementing an executable version of my <a href="http://tetradianbooks.com/2008/10/silos-method-ref/" title="Modified-ADM reference-sheet">amended-TOGAF ADM</a>, as one directly useful place to start. Watch this space?</p>
<p>[Many thanks to <a href="http://twitter.com/CyberSal" title="Sally Bean on Twitter">Sally Bean</a> for her initial pointer to the 30megs site, by the way.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://weblog.tetradian.com/2009/07/01/executable-ea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

