Thanks!!
I think all trees are connected. In fact in the example I gave on the thread in response to Andrey’s comment, I showed business motivation model capture as tree that links down to IT tree (RCL’s current scope). Similarly all other trees can be connected.

Thanks
Anusheel

Yup – well, you have a mention now, don’t you? (And my apologies, I should have replied to you about your work on requirements-trees some time back – kind of distracted at the moment avoiding writing a book that needs to completed by mid next week… )

This discussion here about value-trees is much the same kind point as I was making about your requirements-trees: each trail is an identifiable and (mostly) hierarchical tree, but it’s separate from the management hierarchy-tree, and separate from yet interweaving with the equivalent trees from all the other value-themes. There are trees, but it’s definitely not a single tree. That’s why it’s so complex.

Best wishes, anyway – and thanks for joining in with this.

I too discussed Tree nature of requirements capture with you on Enterprise Architecture Network. Bala might also have discussed it with you.

I think I also deserved a mention in your weblogs now .

Thread is posted below for your reference.

http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?viewQuestionAndAnswers=&gid=36781&discussionID=1560344&sik=1236979050382&trk=ug_qa_q&goback=.ana_36781_1236979050382_3_1

Thanks,
Anusheel